References

Introduction

CDKN (Climate & Development Knowledge Network) (2015), Using climate information for large-scale hydropower planning in sub-Saharan Africa, (policy brief), https://cdkn.org/%0Aresource/climate-change-data-hydropower-planning-sub-saharan-africa/

IEA (International Energy Agency) (2019), World Energy Outlook 2019, https://www.iea.org/topics/world-energy-outlook

Ligtvoet, A. et al. (2015), Value sensitive design of complex product systems, In: Policy Practice and Digital Science: Integrating Complex Systems, Social Simulation and Public Administration in Policy Research (eds. Janssen, M., M. A. Wimmer and A. Deljoo, Springer, https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319127835

WMO (World Meteorological Organization) (2020), WMO Statement on the Status of the Global Climate in 2019, https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=10211

Climate risks to African hydropower

CDKN (Climate and Development Knowledge Network) (2015), Using Climate Information for Large-Scale Hydropower Planning in Sub-Saharan Africa, https://cdkn.org/%0Aresource/climate-change-data-hydropower-planning-sub-saharan-africa/

Centre for Disaster Philanthropy (2019) Tropical Cyclone Idai, 4 March 2019, https://disasterphilanthropy.org/disaster/tropical-cyclone-idai/.

DFID (Department for International Development) (2011), Defining Disaster Resilience: A DFID Approach Paperhttps://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/186874/ 10.

Gernaat, D.E.H.J. et al. (2017), High-resolution assessment of global technical and economic hydropower potential, Nature Energy 2, 821–828, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0006-y

International Hydropower & Dams (2019), 2019 World Atlas & Industry Guide, https://www.hydropower-dams.com/world-atlas/

IEA (International Energy Agency) (2019a), World Energy Outlook 2019, https://www.iea.org/topics/world-energy-outlook

IEA (2019b), Renewables 2019, https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2019

IHA (International Hydropower Association) (2019), Hydropower Status Report 2018, International Hydropower Association. www.hydropower.org/status2019

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2014a), AR5 Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/

IPCC (2014b), AR5 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2014_, at:https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/

IPCC (2014c), AR5 Climate Change 2014 Mitigation of Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/

IPCC (2012), Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Kuo, L. (2016), Africa’s biggest hydropower plant may soon run out of water, Quartz Africa, December 14, 2016, https://qz.com/africa/862789/mozambiques-hydropower-dam-supplies-south-africa-and-zimbabwe-may-soon-run-out-of-water/

ReliefWeb (2019), Malawi - Floods: Update 1 Briefing Note – 19 March 2019, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclone_Idai#cite_note-Malawi_RW5-76

Trace, S. (2019), The impact of climate change on hydropower in Africa, https://www.opml.co.uk/blog/the-impact-of-climate-change-on-hydropower-in-africa

The Watchers (2019), At least 56 dead, 115 000 affected as severe floods hit Malawi, 9 March 2019, https://watchers.news/2019/03/09/malawi-flood-march-2019.

World Bank (2019), Stepping up climate adaptation and resilience in africa, 11 March 2019, https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2019/03/11/stepping-up-climate-adaptation-and-resilience-in-africa

World Bank (2014), Understanding the Impact of Climate Change on Hydropower: The Case of Cameroon, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/243651468010867538/pdf/879130ESW0P1140Box385106B00PUBLIC0.pdf

UNESCO (2019), Water as Cross-Cutting Factor in the SDGs Under Reveiw at the High-Level Policy Forum for Sustainable Development 2019 in Africa, https://www.uneca.org/sites/default/files/upl%0Aoaded-documents/ARFSD/2019/water_as_cross-cutting_factor_in_the_sdgs_under_review%0A_at_the_high-level_panel_forum_for_sustainable_development_hlpf_2019_in_africa.pdf

WMO (World Meteorological Organization) (2020), WMO Statement on the Status of the Global Climate in 2019, https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=10211

WMO (2019a), Reducing vulnerability to extreme hydro-meteorological hazards in Mozambique after Cyclone IDAI: WMO mission report following tropical cyclone IDAI (29 April‑7 May 2019), https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=6259

WMO (2019b), 2019 State of Climate Services: Agriculture and Food Security (WMO‑No. 1242), https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=10089

Climate impacts on African hydropower

ADB (Asian Development Bank) (2013), Guidelines for Climate Proofing Investment in the Energy Sector, https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/33896/files/guidelines-climate-proofing-investment-energy-sector.pdf

BBC (2019), Cyclone Idai: What's the role of climate change? 20 March 2019, https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-47638588

Bloomberg (2019), Power-Starved Zimbabwe, Zambia Face Further Drought-Induced Blackouts, 5 August 2019, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-05/power-starved-zimbabwe-zambia-face-further-drought-induced-dark

Burillo, D. (2018), Effects of Climate Change in Electric Power Infrastructures, Power System Stability, https://www.intechopen.com/books/power-system-stability/effects-of-climate-change-in-electric-power-infrastructures

Centre for Disaster Philanthropy (2019), Tropical Cyclone Idai, 4 March 2019, https://disasterphilanthropy.org/disaster/tropical-cyclone-idai/

CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) (2019), South Africa’s blackouts demonstrate need for distributed energy resources, https://www.cfr.org/blog/south-africas-blackouts-demonstrate-need-distributed-energy-resources

Ebinger, J. and W. Vergara (2011), Climate Impacts on Energy Systems: Key Issues for Energy Sector Adaptation, World Bank, Washington, DC. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/580481468331850839/Climate-impacts-on-energy-systems-key-issues-for-energy-sector-adaptation

Gernaat, D.E.H.J. (2019), The role of renewable energy in long-term energy and climate scenarios, Utrecht University, https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/381146

Gernaat, D.E.H.J. et al. (2017), High-resolution assessment of global technical and economic hydropower potential, Nature Energy 2, 821–828.

Golombek, R., S.A.C. Kittelsen and I. Haddeland (2012), Climate change: Impacts on electricity markets in Western Europe, Climatic Change 113, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-011-0348-6

Hydropower & Dams International (2019), 2019 World Atlas & Industry Guide. https://www.hydropower-dams.com/product/2019-world-atlas-industry-guide/

IEA (International Energy Agency) (2019a), World Energy Outlook 2019, https://www.iea.org/topics/world-energy-outlook

IEA (2019b), Electricity Information 2019, https://webstore.iea.org/electricity-information-2019

IEA (2016), “Energy, Climate Change and the Environment. 2016 Insights” The Global Energy Challenge, https://webstore.iea.org/weo-2015-special-report-energy-and-climate-change

IEA (2015), WEO 2015 Special Report: Energy and Climate Change, https://webstore.iea.org/weo-2015-special-report-energy-and-climate-change

IHA (International Hydropower Association) (2019), Hydropower Sector Climate Resilience Guide, https://www.hydropower.org/publications/hydropower-sector-climate-resilience-guide

IHA (2017), Hydropower Status Report 2016, https://www.hydropower.org/sites/default/files/publications-docs/2016%20Hydropower%20Status%20Report_1.pdf

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2014), AR5 Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report, www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/

IPCC (2011), Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/renewable-energy-sources-and-climate-change-mitigation/

ISIMIP Database, https://www.isimip.org/ (accessed May 2020).

Keelings, D., and J.J. Hernández Ayala (2019), Extreme rainfall associated with Hurricane Maria over Puerto Rico and its connections to climate variability and change, (Research letter, 04 March 2019), Geophysical Research Letters 46 (5), https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2019GL082077

Kwasinski, A. et al. (2019), Hurricane Maria effects on Puerto Rico electric power infrastructure, IEEE Power and Energy Technology Systems Journal, 6 (1): 85–94, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=8644031

Lehner, B., K. Verdin and A. Jarvis (2008), New global hydrography derived from spaceborne elevation data, Eos, Transactions, AGU 89 (10): 93–94, https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2008EO100001

NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory) (2017), How Is Solar PV Performing in Hurricane-Struck Locations?, https://www.nrel.gov/state-local-tribal/blog/posts/how-is-solar-pv-performing-in-hurricane-struck-locations.html.

Onishi, N. (2016), Climate Change Hits Hard in Zambia, an African Success Story, The New York Times, 12 April 2016, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/13/world/africa/zambia-drought-climate-change-economy.html

Oxfam International (2019), After the storm: One year on from Cyclone Idai, https://www.oxfam.org/en/after-storm-one-year-cyclone-idai/

Parkpoom, S., G.P. Harrison, G.P., and J.W. Bialek (2004), Climate change impacts on electricity demand in Universities Power Engineering Conference, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1492245

Patricola, C.M. and M.F. Wehner (2018), Anthropogenic Influences on Major Tropical Cyclone Events, Nature 563: 339–46, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0673-2

ReliefWeb (2019), Malawi - Floods: Update 1 Briefing Note – 19 March 2019, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclone_Idai#cite_note-Malawi_RW5-76

The Telegraph (2019), Cyclone Idai and climate change: The key questions, 22 March 2019, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/climate-and-people/cyclone-idai-climate-change-key-questions/

The Watchers (2019), At least 56 dead, 115 000 affected as severe floods hit Malawi, 9 March 2019, https://watchers.news/2019/03/09/malawi-flood-march-2019

Trace, S. (2019), The Impact of Climate Change on Hydropower in Africa, https://www.opml.co.uk/blog/the-impact-of-climate-change-on-hydropower-in-africa

US EIA (US Energy Information Administration) (2019), Hydropower explained, https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/hydropower/hydropower-and-the-environment.php

US Department of Energy (2017), 2017 Hydropower Market Report, https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2018/04/f51/Hydropower Market Report.pdf

WMO (World Meteorological Organization) (2020), WMO Statement on the Status of the Global Climate in 2019, https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=10211

WMO (2019), Mozambique cyclones are “wake-up call,” says WMO, 29 May 2019, https://public.wmo.int/en/media/press-release/mozambique-cyclones-are-%E2%80%9Cwake-call%E2%80%9D-says-wmo

WMO (2017), Energy Exemplar to the User Interface Platform of the Global Framework for Climate Services, https://gfcs.wmo.int/sites/default/files/Priority-Areas/Energy/GFCS_Energy%20Exemplar_JN17453.pdf

Measures to enhance the resilience of African hydropower

African Risk Capacity (2017), Capacity Building Programme Brochure, https://www.africanriskcapacity.org

Berga, Luis (2016), The role of hydropower in climate change mitigation and adaptation: A review, Engineering, 2(3), 313-318, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.03.004.

Climate Bonds Initiative (2019), Climate Resilience Principles, https://www.climatebonds.net/climate-resilience-principles

CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation ) (2018), Climate Compass A Climate Risk Management Framework for Commonwealth Agencies, https://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/1f56cd3f-dd0f-4f4e-9f14-66ceca36125b/files/climate-compass-climate-risk-management-framework-commonwealth-agencies.pdf

EBRD (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development) (2019), 1.625% US$700 million 5‑year climate resilience bond due 27 September 2024, https://www.ebrd.com/documents/treasury/1625-us700-million-5year-climate-resilience-bond-due-27-september-2024.pdf%3Fblobnocache%3Dtrue+&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=fr

EEA (2019), Adaptation Challenges and Opportunities for the European Energy System: Building a Climate‑resilient Low‑carbon Energy System, https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/adaptation-in-energy-system

Green Climate Fund (2015), Funding proposal: Tajikistan: Scaling-up Hydropower Sector Climate Resilience, https://www.greenclimate.fund/project/fp040

International Capital Market Association (2018), Green Bond Principles, https://www.icmagroup.org/green-social-and-sustainability-bonds/green-bond-principles-gbp/

IEA (International Energy Agency) (2016), Energy, Climate Change and Environment: 2016 Insights, (Report, November 2019), https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-climate-change-and-environment-2016-insights

IHA (International Hydropower Association) (2019), Hydropower Sector Climate Resilience Guide, https://www.hydropower.org/publications/hydropower-sector-climate-resilience-guide

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2014), AR5 Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/

IPCC (2012), Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/managing-the-risks-of-extreme-events-and-disasters-to-advance-climate-change-adaptation/

NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) (2014), U.S. Climate Resilience Toolkit, https://toolkit.climate.gov/topics/energy-supply-and-use

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2018), Climate-Resilient Infrastructure, http://www.oecd.org/environment/cc/policy-perspectives-climate-resilient-infrastructure.pdf

Ogallo, Laban, and Christopher Oludhe (2009), Climate Information in Decision-Making in the Greater Horn of Africa: Lessons and Experiences, https://public.wmo.int/en/bulletin/climate-information-decision-making-greater-horn-africa-lessons-and-experiences

WBCSD (World Business Council for Sustainable Development) (2014), Building a Resilient Power Sector, http://docs.wbcsd.org/2014/03/Building_A_Resilient_Power_Sector.pdf

World Bank (2019), Lifelines: The Resilient Infrastructure Opportunity, http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31805

World Bank (2015), Enhancing the Climate Resilience of Africa’s Infrastructure, (License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO).

Annex

Gernaat, D.E.H.J. (2019), The role of renewable energy in long-term energy and climate scenarios, (dissertation), Utrecht University Repository, https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/381146

Gernaat, D.E.H.J., et al. (2017), High-resolution assessment of global technical and economic hydropower potential, Nature Energy, Vol. 2, pp. 821–828.

IPCC (2014), Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf

ISIMIP Database, https://www.isimip.org/ (accessed May 2020).

Lehner, B., K. Verdin and A. Jarvis (2008), New global hydrography derived from spaceborne elevation data, Eos, Vol. 89, No. 10, pp. 93–94. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2008EO100001

Moss, R. et al. (2008), Towards New Scenarios for Analysis of Emissions, Climate Change, Impacts, and Response Strategies, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236487152_Towards_New_Scenarios_for_Analysis_of_Emissions_Climate_Change_Impacts_and_Response_Strategies_Technical_Summary. 

Scope

The study presented in this report assessed the climate impacts on 64 hydropower plants in 13 African countries between 2020 and 2099, comparing the results with the values of the baseline period from 2010 to 2019.

The geographical scope of the assessment covers Nile basin countries (Egypt, Ethiopia, Kenya, Sudan and Uganda), Congo and Zambezi basin countries (the Democratic Republic of Congo, Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe), a North African country (Morocco) and a West African country (Ghana). The assessment includes over 18 000 MW of installed hydropower capacity in total, accounting for 80% of the total installed hydropower capacity of the 13 African countries, and around 50% of the entire region. About 83% of selected hydropower plants are impoundment facilities with reservoirs. The other 17% are mostly diversion (run-of-river) facilities and one pumped hydropower storage. Each hydropower plant assesed in the study has a different level of capacity factors during the baseline period, depending on its location, size, type and other conditions. To present an integrated analysis of climate impacts on different hydropower plants, the study uses only relative values (% of changes compared to the baseline).

List of selected hydropower plants by country

Country

Hydropower plant

The Democratic Republic of Congo

Inga I and II, Koni, Nseke, Nzilo, Ruzizi I and II, Zongo I and II

Egypt

Aswan High and Low, Esna, Naga Hamady

Ethiopia

Awash II and III, Fincha, Koka, Melka Wakena, Tana-Beles, Tekezé, Tis Abay I and II

Ghana

Akosombo, Bui, Kpong

Kenya

Gitaru, Kamburu, Kiambere, Kindaruma, Masinga, Sondu Miriu, Tana, Turkwel

Malawi

Kapichira, Nkula Falls, Tedzani

Morocco

Afourer, Al Massira, Bin El Ouidane, Imfout, Mansour Ed Dahbi, Moulay Youssef, Al Wahda, Allal El Fassi, Idriss I, Oued El Makhazine

Mozambique

Cahora Bassa

Sudan

Jebel Aulia, El-Girba, Merowe, Roseires, Sennar, Setit and Upper Atabara

Tanzania

Hale, Kidatu, Lower Kihansi, Mtera, Nyumba ya Mungu, Pagani Falls

Uganda

Kiira, Nalubaale

Zambia / Zimbabwe

Itezhi-Tezhi, Kafue Gorge, Kariba, Victoria Falls

Note: Zambia and Zimbabwe are presented as one given their co-ownership of the Kariba hydropower plant. Due to the limited availability of information on some African hydropower plants (particularly small or recently constructed ones), the assessment does not fully cover all hydropower plants located in selected countries.

Models and data

High-resolution (15’’x15’’) global monthly discharge maps are developed by combining low-resolution (0.5˚x 0.5˚) monthly runoff data from each ensemble of General Circulation Models (GCM), Global Hydrological Models (GHM) and Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) with high-resolution (15’’x 15’’) area accumulation and drainage direction maps available from the the HydroSHEDS project (ISIMIP, Database; Gernaat et al., 2017; Lehner et al., 2008), and a low-resolution (0.5˚ x 0.5 ˚) map of monthly runoff.

The discharge maps were used to extract the design discharge and design load factors per hydropower plant (Gernaat, 2019). By ordering the discharge of a selected hydropower plant from the lowest to the highest month of discharge, a flow duration curve was generated. The value of the fourth-highest discharge month is called the design discharge and determines turbine capacity. The capacity factor is, by design, 100% for the four wettest months and less than 100% for the remaining eight drier months. Further information on the selected models and methodology is described below in this Annex. The assessment examined 40 different combinations of GCM, GHM and RCP to ensure the reliability of results and minimise potential distortions by outliers. The results of the assessment present the mean annual and monthly capacity factors of these various ensembles. 

Overview of the GCMs, GHMs and RCPs considered in the assessment

General Circulation Models (GCM)

Global Hydrological Models (GHM)

Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP)

GFDL-ESM2M

H08

RCP 2.6

HadGEM2

LPJmL

RCP 6.0

IPSL-CM5

MPI-HM

 

MIROC-ESM

PCR-GLOBWB

 

NorESM1

 

 

General Circulation Models (GCM)

GFDL-ESM2M was developed by scientists at the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory to make projections of the behaviour of the atmosphere, the oceans and climate, using super-computer and data storage resources. The Laboratory has contributed to each assessment of the IPCC since 1990.

HadGEM2 stands for the Hadley Centre Global Environment Model version 2. The HadGEM2 family of models includes a coupled atmosphere-ocean configuration, with or without a vertical extension in the atmosphere to include a well-resolved stratosphere, and an Earth-System configuration which includes dynamic vegetation, ocean biology and atmospheric chemistry. Members of the HadGEM2 family were used in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report.

IPSL-CM5 model is a full earth system model and the last version of the Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL) which is a consortium of nine research laboratories on climate and the global environment. Based on a physical atmosphere-land-ocean-sea ice model, it also includes a representation of the carbon cycle, the stratospheric chemistry and the tropospheric chemistry with aerosols. The IPSL-CM5 model contributed to the modelling for the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report.

MIROC-ESM was developed by the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute (The University of Tokyo), and National Institute for Environmental Studies.

NorESM1 is the first version of the Norwegian earth system model. It has been applied with medium spatial resolution to provide results for the modelling for IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. It provides complementary results to the evaluation of possible anthropogenic climate change.

Global Hydrological Models (GHM)

H08 is a grid-cell based global hydrological model developed by the National Institute for Environmental Studies of Japan. It consists of six sub-models, namely land surface hydrology, river routing, reservoir operation, crop growth, environmental flow and water abstraction.

LPJmL is a dynamic global vegetation model with managed land use and river routing. It is managed by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. It is designed to simulate vegetation composition and distribution as well as stocks and land-atmosphere exchange flows of carbon and water, for both natural and agricultural ecosystems.

MPI-HM is a global hydrological model developed by the Max Planck Institute to investigate hydrological research questions mostly related to high resolution river routing. While hydrological processes are implemented in similar complexity as in full land surface models, the MPI-HM does not compute any energy-related fluxes.

PCR-GLOBWB is a grid-based global hydrology and water resources model developed at Utrecht University. The computational grid covers all continents except Greenland and Antarctica. It simulates moisture storage in two vertically stacked upper soil layers, as well as the water exchange between the soil, the atmosphere and the underlying groundwater reservoir. The exchange with the atmosphere comprises precipitation, evaporation from soils, open water, snow and soils and plant transpiration, while the model also simulates snow accumulation, snowmelt and glacier melt.

Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP)

The IPCC Fifth Assessment Report defines RCPs as scenarios that include time series of emissions and concentrations of the full suite of GHGs and aerosols and chemically active gases, as well as land use/land cover (Moss et al., 2008). The word representative signifies that each RCP provides only one of many possible scenarios that leads to the specific radiative forcing characteristics. In the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, four RCPs are presented: RCP 2.6, RCP 4.5, RCP 6.0 and RCP 8.5. The RCPs show various representative GHG concentration trajectories and the impact of each level of GHG concentration on the future climate.

This report analyses climate impacts on African hydropower based on two RCPs: RCP 2.6 and RCP 6.0.

The Below 2°C scenario is based on the projections of the RCP 2.6 which assumes a radiative forcing value of around 2.6 W/m2 in the year of 2100. Under the RCP 2.6 the rise in global annual mean temperature stays below 2°C compared to pre-industrial times (1850-1900) by 2100. For the period of 2080-2100, the global annual mean temperature increases by 1.6(±0.4) °C above the level of 1850-1900. The RCP 2.6 assumes an early peak in global GHG emission trends followed by a drastic decline.

The Around 3°C scenario follows the trajectory of the RCP 6.0 which assumes a radiative forcing value of around 6.0 W/m2 in the year of 2100. The RCP 6.0 is associated with a rise of 2.8(±0.5) °C in global annual mean temperature for the period of 2080-2100 compared to the pre-industrial level. The RCP 6.0 is based on the assumption of stabilisation of total radiative forcing after 2100. Under the scenario global GHG emission would peak during the latter half of the century and then decline.  

Overview of the scenarios: Below 2°C and Around 3°C

Scenario

Below 2°C

Around 3°C

Representative Concentration Pathway

RCP 2.6

RCP 6.0

Targeted radiative forcing in the year 2100

2.6 W/m2

6.0 W/m2

CO2-equivalent concentrations (ppm)

430-480

720-1000

Global temperature change

1.6(±0.4)°C

2.8(±0.5)°C

Likelihood of staying below a specific temperature level over the 21st century

Likely to stay below 2°C

More unlikely than likely to stay below 3°C

Source: IPCC (2014), Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf.